In addition, Taiwan had successfully increased defense spending as outlined by President Tsai Ing-wen, who has called for buying drones and electronic warfare equipment along with M1A2 Abrams tanks and F-16V fighter jets, as well as upgrading to its Patriot missile defense system, according to Reuters. This meant the Air Force had fielded its Advanced Battle Management System, which could work with networks and communications technologies procured as part of the Navy’s Project Overmatch and the Army’s Project Convergence efforts. military had implemented its Joint All-Domain Command and Control concept, which would allow the armed services to send data among their previously unconnected sensors and shooters. “If we can change, we can win.”įor example, in the service’s version of the future, the U.S. Clint Hinote, the Air Force’s deputy chief of staff for strategy, integration and requirements, told Defense News in March. Some of those items could influence fiscal 2023 budget deliberations.Ĭhina is “iterating so rapidly, and I think that forces us to change,” said Lt. The Air Force’s performance this fall offers a clearer vision of what mix of aircraft, drones, networks and other weapons systems it will need in the next decade if it hopes to beat China in a potential war.
Still, the outcome was a marked improvement to similar war games held over the last two years, which ended in catastrophic losses. While legacy planes like the B-52 bomber and newer ones like the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter played a role, many key technologies featured during the exercise are not in production or even planned for development by the service. Furthermore, the air force that fought in the simulated conflict isn’t one that exists today, nor is it one the service is seemingly on a path to realize.
0 kommentar(er)
